Quantcast
Channel: Software Journal » targeting systems
Browsing all 6 articles
Browse latest View live

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Confusion Matrix – Another Single Value Metric – Kappa Statistic

Background: This is another in the line of posts on how to compare confusion matrices. The path, as has been taken in the past is in terms of using some aggregate objective function (or single value...

View Article



Ethical/Policy issues concerning Targeting Systems

Targeting Systems can be used to target a very variety of “things”. The things can be people, tax filings, medical claims, flights, customers, and many others. For example, targeting systems can be...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Targeting Systems vs. Classification Systems

It is generally said that targeting system is a degenerate classification system with only two labels.  However, this is misleading.  For example, consider that you are trying to identify a list of...

View Article

Comparing two confusion matrices

Comparing two confusion matrices is a standard approach for comparing the respective targeting systems, but by no means is it the only one. As we will discuss in the coming days, you can also compare...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Comparing Kappa Statistic to the F1 measure

We looked at Kappa Statistic previously, and I have been evaluating some aspects of it again. To remind ourselves, Kappa statistic is a measure of consistency amongst different raters, taking into...

View Article


Why “Accuracy” of a Classification System may be a Useless Metric?

Recently, I received a slide deck extolling the virtue of an exciting new classification system with a purported accuracy of 62.5%. While the number itself is not very high to begin with, the value of...

View Article
Browsing all 6 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images